Tag Archives: Honolulu

Honolulu Chair Tommy Waters Appeal to the Hawaii Supreme Court Hearing against Circuit Court Ruling that he was ineligible to run for a Third Term.

Screenshots from Honolulu City Council Website Premier video for a Council Chair.

This transferred appeal arises from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit’s order and judgment declaring that Defendant-Appellant Thomas Waters, a/k/a Tommy Waters (Waters) is ineligible to be elected to the office of Councilmember, District IV, City and County of Honolulu for the 2027-2031 term.

EXCERPT from Hawaii Supreme Court:

TUESDAY, AUGUST 25, 2026 – 2:00 P.M.

NO. SCAP-26-0000550

TREVOR R. OZAWA, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CHADD KADOTA, in his official capacity as Acting City Clerk of the City and County of Honolulu; SCOTT T. NAGO, in his official capacity as Chief Election Officer of the State of Hawai‘i, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees, and THOMAS WATERS a/k/a TOMMY WATERS, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court Courtroom
Ali‘iōlani Hale, 2nd Floor
417 South King Street
Honolulu, HI 96813

The oral argument will also be livestreamed for public viewing via the Judiciary’s YouTube channel at YouTube.com/hawaiicourts and ‘Ōlelo at olelo.org/tv-schedule/, subject to ‘Ōlelo’s programming availability.

Attorney for Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee TREVOR R. OZAWA:
     Trevor R. Ozawa of the Law Office of Trevor R. Ozawa

Attorneys for Respondent/Defendant-Appellee CHADD KADOTA, in his official capacity as Acting City Clerk of the City and County of Honolulu:
     Duane W.H. Pang and Jacqueline M. De Leeuw Huang, Deputies Corporation Counsel

Attorneys for Respondent/Defendant-Appellee SCOTT T. NAGO, in his official capacity as Chief Election Officer of the State of Hawai‘i:
     Randall S. Nishiyama, Tiffany R. Chang, and Jung Min Lee, Deputy Attorneys General and Aaron H. Schulaner, General Counsel

Attorneys for Respondent/Defendant-Appellant Thomas Waters a/k/a Tommy Waters:
     Lex R. Smith, Joseph A. Stewart, Bruce A. Nakamura, and Zachary K. Shikada of Kobayashi Sugita & Goda, LLP

NOTE: Certificate of Recusal, by Associate Justice Todd W. Eddins, filed 08/13/26.

NOTE: Certificate of Recusal, by Chief Justice Vladimir P. Devens, filed 08/13/26.

NOTE: Order assigning Circuit Judge Michael K. Soong, in place of Devens, C.J., recused, Circuit Judge Peter T. Cahill, in place of Eddins, J., recused, and Circuit Judge Peter K. Kubota, due to a vacancy, filed 08/13/26.

NOTE: Order granting Application for Transfer, filed 08/13/26.

COURT: Mckenna, Acting C.J. and Ginoza, J., and Circuit Judge Soong, in place of Devens, C.J., recused, Circuit Judge Cahill, in place of Eddins, J. recused, and Circuit Judge Kubota, assigned by reason of vacancy.

Brief Description:

This transferred appeal arises from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit’s order and judgment declaring that Defendant-Appellant Thomas Waters, a/k/a Tommy Waters (Waters) is ineligible to be elected to the office of Councilmember, District IV, City and County of Honolulu for the 2027-2031 term.

Section 3-102 of the Revised Charter of the City & County of Honolulu (Charter) provides, in relevant part, that: “Except as provided in Section 16-122, the regular terms of office of councilmembers shall be four years beginning at twelve o’clock meridian on the second day of January following their election. . . . No person shall be elected to the office of councilmember for more than two consecutive four-year terms.”

On January 25, 2019, this court invalidated the November 6, 2018 nonpartisan second special election for councilmember for District IV, City and County of Honolulu. It is undisputed that Waters was elected District IV councilmember in a subsequent April 2019 special election and was sworn into office in May 2019. Waters was re-elected in November 2022.

In this case before the circuit court, Plaintiff-Appellee Trevor R. Ozawa sought a declaration that Waters may not be elected as District IV councilmember for the 2027-2031 term under Section 3-102 of the Charter.

The circuit court concluded that Waters is ineligible to be elected as District IV councilmember for the 2027-2031 term.

End of Announcement

ACTING City Clerk Chad Kadota

Tommy Waters as Chair of Honolulu City Council June 3rd, 2026

Another Action involving Chair Tommy Waters:

On August 18, 2026, a handful of District 4 voters have submitted to the Hawaii Supreme a COMPLAINT CONTESTING the Primary Election for their District – – to not remove Tommy Waters from the November 3, 2026 General Elections Ballot.

EXCERPT from By Daryl Huff

Published: Aug. 18, 2026 at 5:09 PM HST HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) – 

The complaint says the second error was the clerk telling voters that Waters’ votes were invalid. “By declaring Waters ineligible,” the complaint says, “the Honolulu Elections Division changed the primary election results and disenfranchised voters.

“If he’s ruled eligible, then we should have a new election,” Iwasa said. “Probably even if he’s ruled ineligible, have a new election because there are just so many votes out there, thousands of them, right, who voted with one thing in mind and then learning, oh, that’s not going to work.”

Ozawa said in a statement, “Every step in this process has been public, followed the law, and been decided by a judge, not by any campaign. I trust the Supreme Court to bring this to a fair and final resolution, and in the meantime I’m staying focused on earning the votes of East Honolulu this November.”

Attorney says outcome uncertain

“The only way that they can change who is on the ballot is through an election contest. That has been settled law in Hawaii for over 100 years,” attorney Lance Collins said.

Collins says the challengers may not get the outcome they want, because the court could agree Waters is ineligible and also find that his votes should have been considered blank, which would mean Ozawa won outright with well over 50% of the valid votes.

“There is an outside chance that the Supreme Court could just simply say, Judge Ashford got it right. And as to the election contest, Mr. Ozawa outright won the race,” Collins said.

Asked how she would feel if that happened, Iwasa said, “I would feel, I would be really upset, honestly, with you. Because that, in my opinion, would not be fair at all.”

The court is on a tight deadline and could hear arguments on the appeals and challenges a week from Tuesday.

Some Answers to Your Questions about the Honolulu City Council 64% Pay Raise Controversy

2023 Pay Raise Ruckus

Parts of this information is from public domain. The Approval of the City Council 54% Pay Raise is on around April 22, 2023. This huge increase caught the ire of the public. Much attention was focused on this issue that also produced significant attendance that prolonged into the evening at Honolulu Hale.

Tommy Waters was the Chair of the Honolulu City Council who pushed this through. This is the recording on June 7, 2023 beginning 6:59

There was even a polling by the Honolulu Star Advertiser with overwhelming voters against the 64% pay raise.

Chair Tommy Waters dug in his heels.

In 2023, the Honolulu Salary Commission approved a controversial 64% pay raise that increased City Council members’ salaries from $68,904 to $113,304 per year, and raised the Council chair’s salary to $123,288. The adjustment cost the city an additional $44,40 annually per participating member.

Summary of 2023 Adjustments

  • Council Members: Base pay increased from $68,904 to $113,304
  • Council Chair: Pay increased from $76,968 to 123,288
  • Mayor & Executive Leadership: Received a smaller 12.6% pay raise during the same cycle, with the mayor’s salary rising above $200,000.00

Key Developments Since 2023

  • Charter Amendment Capping Raises: Public backlash over the hike led Oahu voters to overwhelmingly approve a charter amendment, which took effect in 2025, capping future raises at 5% annually and removing the City Council’s authority to vote on their own compensation.

I voted NO against this Charter Amendment Capping Raises. It fundamentally takes the accountability from the ELECTED City Council Members. It passes the buck to the Salary Commission and takes the City Council members off the hook.

This is a very bad direction in many ways.

First, the city council position is an elected position. It should not be clumped together into the regular employee salary category.

Second, the City Council members must be accountable to the public in this elected office.

Third, the City Council and the Mayor appoints members to the Honolulu Salary Commission who will make the ultimate decision on salaries for the people who appointed them.

  • Rejections: Council members Andria Tupola, Radiant Cordero, and Augie Tulba formally rejected the 2023 pay raise at the time.
  • In 2023, Councilmember Andria Tupola, along with Councilmember Augie Tulba, introduced two resolutions (Resolution 23-81 and Resolution 23-82) to reject the Honolulu Salary Commission’s controversial 64% pay raise for council members and executives.
  • Resolution 23-81: Requested the rejection of salary increases and schedules for all city officials (including the Mayor and executives) on the basis of current economic conditions. Although the Council Chair Tommy Waters refused to put this Resolution on the Agenda to be discussed. Irate residents went ahead and submitted written testimonies to this Resolution to vent their anger. Read the written testimonies here.
  • Resolution 23-82: Specifically called to reject the Council members’ and the Council chair’s pay hikes, citing that the recommended raises were “unreasonably high and should not be allowed to take effect”.
  • Residents again were denied public participation as Chair Tommy Waters refused to put the two about Resolutions into the agenda for discussion. Residents collected some petitions but to no avail.
  • Because Council Chair Tommy Waters refused to schedule the resolutions for a hearing, the salary increase never received a vote amongst the council members. However, The Salary Commission Recommendations were accepted. The public was denied public participation. Tupola ( and Augie Tulba) formally rejected the pay raise in a memo to the city to keep their salary at its lower 2022 level ($68,904), although she eventually accepted the higher salary after the buzz subsided and she was re-elected.

2026 – – Another salary increase. City Council member Esther Kia’aina presently opposed the Salary Commission 4.7% making a differentiation between elected and employee salaries. However, she was a staunch supporter of the 2023 salary 64% increase. She also supported the City Charter Question relieving the City Council of accountable by giving full power of decision to the appointed Salary Commission.

  • Subsequent Adjustments: In 2026, the Honolulu Salary Commission authorized another 4.7% salary increase for executive and legislative posts, pushing regular council members’ salaries to $127,801

Don’t mess with the US Constitution

Reprint: Hawaii State Legislature 2022

Choon James

onSeptdorst0brc 1317a6i2708ue40237y2686ra4u58f7fga1F2a54,2l  ·

Shared with Public

Public

DEFERRED to Tuesday 2-8 3:05PM AGENDA. SB 1357 to prohibit flags display on vehicles on roads, etc. SCROLL TO 1:30 for status: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_Puas70MFA

We can’t have government shutting down Free Speech.

SECTION 1. The legislature finds that flags flown from vehicles being operated or moved on streets cause distractions and create unsafe driving conditions. The purpose of this Act is to discourage unsafe practices.

—————————————————————-

We must protect Free Speech at all costs.

There are lots of distractions and unsafe driving conditions on the road – Loose dogs. Drunk driving. Driving in opposite directions. Tourist trolleys. Huge vehicles blocking our view planes. Sign Waving. Display of huge banners on buildings along roads.

The item that is most distracting is the POTHOLES!!

We’re forced to keep our eyes down on the road to avoid the potholes which are EVERYWHERE. Our tires blow out. Cars try to miss the potholes on busy streets. The underbelly of the vehicles are damaged.

POTHOLES are the most dangerous and most distracting.

Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent but our roads have become more and more dangerous. We would like the Hawaii Senate to focus on this huge distraction …. require a warranty on the road roadwork and so on to promote road safety. It’s ridiculous that every time it rains, more potholes appear. There is no reason why the state cannot expect basic workmanship for the hundreds of millions that are spent annually.

Please terminate SB 1357 – It’s treacherous to free speech and an open democracy.

#2022 #HawaiiStateCapitol #FreeSpeech #FirstAmendment

Hamajang HB1990 – Chronology of a Dictator’s Bill to fine $1000 minimum per day for ANY violations of County Ordinance, Rule, and Regulation. $20,000 fine TOTAL will face foreclosure!

Why? Why does the public not know about this?

AYES (WR) With Reservations is still a “YES” vote.

Hamajang HB1990 (2026) – Chronology of a Dictator’s Bill to fine $1000 minimum per day for ANY violations of County Ordinance, Rule, and Regulation. $20,000 fine TOTAL will face foreclosure!

HOUSE REPORT FROM THE Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs Committee:

All these Bills have the same agenda = HB1990, HB1861, HB811, HB106, HB29 for the last five years.

Hamajang HB1990 – Chronology of a Dictator’s Bill to fine $1000 minimum per day for ANY violations of County Ordinance, Rule, and Regulation. $20,000 fine TOTAL will face foreclosure!

SENATE JUDICIARY and WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEES’ VOTING RECORD.

This was a very secretive Bill. While Hawaii was trying to handle the Kona Low flooding and storms, this Bill was sailing through without public knowledge until at the end.

Hawaii was protesting “NO KING” “NO TYRANT” “NO DICTATOR” OUTSIDE the State Capitol while legislators INSIDE the Capitol were passing these tyrannical bills.

Typically, an ordinary person does not have the time to participate. Most people who are at these sessions are lobbyists, bureaucrats, interest groups, and corporations. The procedures are also foreign to most citizens.

Hawaii SENATE Judiciary Committee and Ways and Mean Committee Report to the Senate President.

What is the intent of these quickie tyrannical Power of Sale and Foreclosure Sale?

Hawaii: Bipolar legislation in 2026

While there are vigorous protests of “NO KING”, “NO DICTATOR” “NO TYRANNY” outside the Hawaii State Capitol, tyrannical laws are being pushed through inside the Capitol

Mahalo again for giving voice AGAINST HB1990.

Keep calling the senators to Kill HB1990! They should hear from you.

The last I look, HB1990 is still recommitted to the Judicial and Ways and Means. No movement or no new amendments to it. I hope there is no Gut & Replace actions.

It’s never a good idea to give the government more overarching, overreaching and tyrannical powers to fine you $1,000 per day minimum. And when it reaches to $20,000, you can be slammed with a foreclosure. This is Tyranny.

The Bill language  is very vague – ANY – ANY violations of county ordinances, rules, and regulations. Every owner becomes a sitting duck to the whim of the long arm of the government.    

Chronology of tyranny:

This Power of Sale based on county fines first began as an annual Legislative Package to the State Legislature in 2021. All neighbor Mayors were part of this package.  This covered ALL COUNTIES.

2021 – 2024  Mayor Rick Blangiardi persisted. We saw HB106 and many similar Bills with the same Agenda. But fortunately, these bills never got passed.

In 2025, the Honolulu Mayor distanced himself. HouseRepresentative Corey Chun from Waipahu introduced HB29. Fortunately, it was DEFERED By the Finance Committee.  

2025 also saw   Bill 811 introduced by Scot Matayoshi, Corey Chun, MichaelLee . Lisa Marten, Sean Quinlan, Greg Takayama. This is a bill on steriods. Foreclosure begins when your fines reaches $5,000! It will only take 5 days when the bill wants to fine you $1,000 per day minimum. What are these politicians thinking? This Bill did not gain traction.

Introducer(s):MATAYOSHI, CHUN, LEE, M., MARTEN, QUINLAN, TAKAYAMA This one imposes only $5,000 instead of $20,000 for a foreclosure slam! It did not gain traction.

2026  These Power of Sale Bills only needed 2 House Committees  to pass the House. Finance Committee was bypassed.   HB1861 was introduced by Quinland, Matayoshi, Marten, and Olds did not cross over this year.

Simultanteously,  another Bill1990 which we did not know about till recently, quietly progressed to where we are today  

Introducer(s):MATAYOSHI, GRANDINETTI, KILA, KUSCH, LEE, M., MARTEN, MORIKAWA, OLDS, TAKAYAMA, TAM, TARNAS, TEMPLO, TODD, WOODSON

Demoracy is at stake. We cannot be protesting NO KINGS – NO TYRANTS and then impose tyranny upon Hawaii’s residents with these secretive Bills to oppress. 

Hawaii Legislative Fines and Knee-jerk Quickie Foreclosures

Some legislators are quietly robbing basic constitutional civil rights of their private property owners constituents!

We were informed a couple days ago that HB1990 is sailing through! This is an abusive and greedy bill – – A notice of violation of ANY county zoning ordinance, rule or regulation shall be fined . . . $1000 per day subject to a lien if the fines exceed $20,000 and subject to foreclosure within 30 days of notice.

The Bill affects ALL Counties.

Who in Oahu alone can get a quick response from the County within 30 days! There are 30 days in a month, so $20,000 is easy number to become ripe for foreclosure!

What can you do?

Email the Senators. Tell them to “KILL HB1990” and other opinions you may have. Cut and paste on your email addresses.

sens@capitol.hawaii.gov,
 senihara@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senelefante@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senChang@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senkouchi@capitol.hawaii.gov,
sendelacruz@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senrichards@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senmisalucha@capitol.hawaii.gov,
sennishihara@capitol.hawaii.gov,
sendecoite@capitol.hawaii.gov,
sensshimabukuro@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senfevella@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senmoriwaki@capitol.hawaii.gov,
sengabbard@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senwakai@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senawa@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senfukunaga@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senhashimoto@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senkeohokalole@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senkidani@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senkim@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senlamosao@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senmckelvey@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senrhoads@capitol.hawaii.gov,
sensanbuenaventura@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senlee@capitol.hawaii.gov,
senkanuha@capitol.hawaii.gov,

A DEEPER DIVE:

The person who just informed us of HB1900 (2026) also shared HB811(2025).

HB811( 2025) too is very alarming and jarring. Who in their right mind think that fines of $5,000 should trigger a foreclosure within 30 days! Who knows how tedious and long it is to work with a county bureaucracy to get a permit for anything?

It’s common knowledge that any one or group can ask a Hawaii Legislator to draft a bill and sponsor it. This is a good democratic exercise for public participation.

However, there should be a litmus test to ensure that basic constitutional civil rights are not violated or infringed upon. Any proposed Bill ought to be for the public good and for the benefit for all Hawaii.

A proposed Bill can’t be appeasing one person or group to the detriment of the rest of Hawaii.

A proposed Bill cannot be a Mafia hit to a single issue because someone/group wants to. The Multiplier Impacts as well as Unintended Consequences on different levels of any proposed bill ought to analyzed and discussed intelligently BEFORE introduction.

I cannot recognize the signature of the legislative introducer. But the record shows the Introducers of HB811 as ( GANG OF SIX)

Introducer(s):MATAYOSHI, CHUN, LEE, M., MARTEN, QUINLAN, TAKAYAMA

I would like to know what’s their heads? Does any one of them own property or know what it’s like to own a property? Why waste taxpayers’ money to write this type of pilau bill? Does the introducer even know a typical home in Hawaii is $1M? Most of our local families are not born with a silver spoon in their mouth. They work hard to own a house that they can call their own. Why turn their own constituents into a sitting duck for the long arm of the government? It’s never a good idea to give the long arm of the government more powers.

The above (2025) HB811 looks like an early draft to HB1990 (2026) which is sailing through quietly at the State Capitol as of this writing.

Note they’ve added a few more legislators to sign into it. GANG OF 14.

Introducer(s):MATAYOSHI, GRANDINETTI, KILA, KUSCH, LEE, M., MARTEN, MORIKAWA, OLDS, TAKAYAMA, TAM, TARNAS, TEMPLO, TODD, WOODSON

2026 also has another similar Trojan Horse in HB1861. The Introducers are recorded as (GANG OF 4)

Introducer(s):QUINLAN, MARTEN, MATAYOSHI, OLDS

Did you legislator tell you about this possible sea-change?

Do you know what’s going on? Has any of your legislators disclose this drastic actions to you? The common denominator for repeat introducers is QUINLAN, MARTEN, MATAYOSHI, OLDS, CHUN*.

What’s just as alarming is that these Capitol Committee Chairs have the tendency to simply get along to move along to the detriment of the public. They spill out the same old illogical phrases – “This Bill deserves more conversation” or “This deserves more discussion” or “This deserves more dialogue”. They cherry-pick what they want to hear and do. They usually prepare the “amendments” before hand. So the Committee Chair will pass it out to the next chain for the sake of “more conversation”.

How can a conversation work for the constituents with a 2-minute testimony? How does a conversation work for the 99.9% public who cannot attend these hearings?

Shouldn’t these discussions/dialogue/conversations happening with the grassroots constituents first?

First, constituents need to know about these Bills. Constituents need to know about these Bills BEFORE they are introduced and put on the fast track to adopt. After-the-Fact laws is sneaky and undemocratic.

All these new civil fines and foreclosures began with Honolulu Mayor Blangiardi in 2021. He persisted each subsequent year until Representative Corey Chun of Waipahu because the sole introducer of similar agenda in 2025.

“NO KINGS” “NO TYRANTS” protests nationwide today.

But the Hawaii State Legislature HB1990 to fine residents $1000 a day and quick foreclosure is secretly sailing through.

We are trying to stop HB1861 with the same agenda. But we did not know about HB1990. It feels sneaky. Why no disclosure of these significant changes that affect the lives of residents. Ordinary residents shouldn’t have to bird-dog politicians to make sure they do us no harm or just introduce hamajang Bills!

This agenda to have a new foreclosure powers through new county fines was initiated by Mayor Blangiardi in 2021. Blangiardi pushed every year. In 2025, a similar Bill 29 was introduced by House Representative Corey Chun of Waipahu.

This year, HB1861 was introduced by four (4) House Representatives – Sean Quinlan, Scott Matayoshi, Lisa Marten and Ikaika Olds.

Unfortunately, while ordinary residents were stopping HB1861, there was a concurrent BILL HB1990 sailing through. We heard about it a day ago! What a devious system! Three of the 4 Introducers for HB1861 are also introducers for HB1990 – Scott Matayoshi, Lisa Marten, and Ikaiko Olds. ( Sean Quinland’s name is no longer here.)

This unconstitutional agenda has been ongoing and initiated by Mayor Blangiardi since 2021. Blangiardi pushed every year. In 2025, a similar Bill 29 was introduced by House Representative Corey Chun of Waipahu. 2026 brought new and more introducers!

Colleen Hanabusa dies at age 74 – – 1951-2026

This is a reprint from The Honolulu Advertiser for educational purposes. ( We added extra links from other publications for more information.)

By Dan Nakaso and Andrew Gomes

March 6, 2026

STAR-ADVERTISER / JAN. 8, 2018
                                U.S. Rep. Colleen Hanabusa formally announces she is running for governor during a gathering on the east lawn of the State Capitol building with dozens of her supporters in 2018.

STAR-ADVERTISER / JAN. 8, 2018

U.S. Rep. Colleen Hanabusa formally announces she is running for governor during a gathering on the east lawn of the State Capitol building with dozens of her supporters in 2018.

Colleen Hanabusa, a formidable Hawaii politician and prominent labor lawyer from Waianae who served in Congress but failed to become Hawaii’s governor and Honolulu’s mayor, died early Friday morning at the age of 74.

Hanabusa had been hospitalized for five months with cancer, her family said.

Gov. Josh Green ordered the U.S. and Hawaiian flags be flown at half-staff at the state Capitol, all state offices and agencies, and all Hawaii National Guard facilities in honor of Hanabusa, a former U.S. representative and president of the state Senate who more recently chaired the board of the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation.

Colleen Opens in a new tab Hanabusa dedicated her life to serving the people of Hawaii Opens in a new tab — from the Waianae Coast she proudly called home, to the halls of the Hawaii State Capitol and the United States Congress,” Green said in a news release. “She broke barriers as the first woman to serve as President of the Hawaii State Senate and spent decades advocating for her community with strength, determination and heart. Her legacy of leadership and public service will continue to inspire generations to come.”

Honolulu Mayor Rick Blangiardi, who appointed Hanabusa to the HART chair, said in a statement, “Hawaii has lost a remarkable leader, and we all have lost a friend. Managing Director Mike Formby and I had a close relationship with Colleen, and she dedicated her life to serving the people of Hawaii with intelligence, determination, and an unwavering sense of purpose.”

City & County of Honolulu flags also will be lowered today through Sunday to honor her.

Hanabusa ended her political career at HART after she, Blangiardi and Lori Kahikina — HART’s executive director and CEO — proposed truncating the route to regain the confidence of the Federal Transit Authority, got long-awaited federal dollars flowing back to the project and opened the first leg of the Skyline system in June 2023.

Asked why Hanabusa would agree to serve as an unpaid volunteer while the rail project faced intense criticism at home and in Washington, D.C., Blangiardi told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser on Friday that “It speaks volumes about her. What it says is that she put Hawaii first.”

Kahikina said, “On behalf of myself and the entire HART Ohana, we are deeply saddened by the news of Colleen Hanabusa’s passing. My deepest sympathy goes out to the Hanabusa ohana. I greatly appreciate her contributions to the Honolulu rail project, and respect and admire her work as a tireless advocate and public servant. HART extends its sincere condolences to all who had the privilege of knowing Colleen.”

Hanabusa was born May 4, 1951, and raised in Waianae where her great-grandparents worked on a sugar plantation and her family later established a service station, Hanabusa Service, in 1948.

Because her parents, June and Isao, devoted so much time to the family business, Hanabusa was raised largely by her maternal grandmother.

After graduating from St. Andrew’s Priory in 1969, Hanabusa earned a bachelor’s degree in sociology and economics from the University of Hawaii in 1973, and followed it with a master’s degree in sociology in 1975 and then a law degree in 1977 also from UH.

As a labor lawyer during the 1980s and early 1990s under her married name at the time, Colleen Sakurai, Hanabusa represented some high-profile clients who were politically powerful and others who were politicians or intersected with politics.

Clients from that time included the Hawaii Teamsters Union in a legal fight to represent state corrections officers, and the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Local 5 union in a dispute over picketing during a statewide hotel strike.

Hanabusa also represented Honolulu City Council members in a 1993 legal skirmish with then-Mayor Frank Fasi to stop him from using Oahu Neighborhood Board elections as an “advisory referendum” on tax funding for a $2 billion Fasi rail transit plan.

One of those Council members, Arnold Morgado, ran for mayor in 1994cq special election and 1996 with Hanabusa as a campaign strategist and attorney. Morgado lost both times to Jeremy Harris.

In 1998, Hanabusa sought political office herself. She ran for a state Senate seat against Sen. James Aki, the Democratic incumbent who a year earlier had been granted deferred acceptance of a no-contest plea to two felony gambling charges. Hanabusa won the primary and went on to win the general election to represent Nanakuli, Waianae and Makaha.

As a first-term lawmaker, Hanabusa quickly made a name for herself by helping organize the rejection of Margery Bronster as then-Gov. Ben Cayetano’s nominee for attorney general.

Then in 2001, she spearheaded efforts to reform state civil service laws, an action that stirred up politically powerful public worker unions.

“While the effort won quick public praise, it immediately drew the opposition of public employee unions, and Hanabusa, although being a labor lawyer, was never a favorite daughter of the public unions,” Honolulu Star-Bulletin reporter and political columnist Richard Borreca wrote in a column a few years later.

Hanabusa caught some heat and tangled with Cayetano again a few years later over legislation she introduced to provide Jeff Stone, developer of Ko Olina Resort & Marina, with $75 million in state tax credits to build a “world class” aquarium to enhance the resort.

The Legislature passed the bill in 2002, but Cayetano vetoed it. In response, Hanabusa sued Cayetano and reintroduced the bill in 2003 after Republican Linda Lingle beat then-Lt. Gov. Mazie Hirono to succeed Cayetano. The bill passed again and was signed by Lingle.

A year later, Hanabusa drew flack after it became publicly known that the home she shared at Ko Olina with her fiancee at the time, state Sheriff John F. Souza III, was sold to Souza by Stone, and that Souza also rented an office from Stone that Hanabusa rented from Souza for her law practice. Souza, a friend of Stone’s, had a trucking company that helped build homes at the resort.

Hanabusa, Souza and Stone said at the time that the real estate deals were at market prices and unrelated to the tax-credit legislation. Hanabusa shortly thereafter married Souza. Later, the aquarium project fizzled.

Higher power

While serving in the Legislature, Hanabusa pursued ambitions for higher office that resulted in two unsuccessful runs for Congress that didn’t put at risk her position in the state Senate.

Hanabusa’s first attempt in 2003 was to fill a vacancy representing urban Honolulu created by the death of U.S. Rep. Patsy Mink. Ed Case won the special election featuring 43 candidates. Hanabusa placed third.

Three years later, Hanabusa challenged Hirono to replace Case, who gave up his U.S. House seat representing rural parts of the state in an unsuccessful bid to unseat U.S. Sen. Daniel Akaka.

Touting her deep westside roots, Hanabusa announced her campaign in front of her family’s service station. “I believe I’ve been a loud voice for the people of the Waianae Coast,” she said. “I hope that the rest of the 2nd Congressional (District) will want to see a Waianae girl there.”

The primary election drew nine Democratic competitors. Hanabusa placed second to Hirono, who was born in Japan and moved to Hawaii when she was 8.

As an unrelated sort of consolation prize, Hanabusa was named Senate president in 2007 and became the first woman to lead the Senate or House of Representatives in Hawaii’s Legislature.

Hanabusa had angled for the Senate’s top position for several years, and succeeded despite early negative feedback.

Local historian Bob Dye wrote in a 2001 Honolulu Advertiser column that Hanabusa was told her goal was unattainable in part because she was a freshman at the time but also because she was a woman and had a “take no prisoners” political style.

Hanabusa’s time in the Legislature and as Senate president lasted until 2010 when then-U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie resigned to take office as Hawaii’s governor.

Abercrombie’s vacancy in Congress resulted in a special election that was won by Republican Charles Djou due to Hanabusa and Case splitting many Democratic votes, but Hanabusa defeated Djou with 53% of the vote in a regular election five months later to represent urban Honolulu.

Spurn and return

When Hawaii’s revered U.S. Sen. Daniel Inouye died in late 2012 at age 88, Hanabusa as his political protege saw a good opportunity to fill the seat, especially because Inouye before death conveyed his “last wish” for her to succeed him.

Abercrombie, however, as governor would pick Inouye’s interim successor, and named his lieutenant governor at the time, Brian Schatz, to fill out the last two years of Inouye’s term.

Two years later, Hanabusa did not seek reelection to her House seat and instead challenged Schatz for his Senate seat, in what became an intense and bruising showdown.

Some Schatz supporters and Hanabusa critics made a case that Schatz, then 41, was positioned to establish longer-term seniority in Congress compared with Hanabusa, then 63.

Hanabusa discounted the notion, telling the Washington Post, “It’s almost like saying that somebody would be anointed for 40 years.”

Schatz won the 2014 primary election by a narrow margin, and Hanabusa returned to Honolulu to practice law.

Honolulu’s mayor at the time, Kirk Caldwell, quickly appointed Hanabusa to the board of directors of the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation overseeing the city’s overdue and over-budget rail project.

UH also selected Hanabusa to teach a course on civil liberties in times of crisis in 2016 as a visiting scholar funded by the Daniel K. Inouye Institute.

Hanabusa was HART’s board chair until 2016 when she returned to Capitol Hill after easily winning an election to succeed then-U.S. Rep. Mark Takai, who decided not to seek reelection due to cancer that led to his death soon after.

Back to HART

Just a year later, in 2017, Hanabusa declared that she wouldn’t seek reelection to the U.S. House so that she could to run for governor in a bid to prevent then-Gov. David Ige from being elected in 2018 to a second four-year term.

During a televised debate, Hanabusa criticized Ige for his handling of a January 2018 false missile alert from the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency, calling the incident that generated widespread public panic “a systemic failure of leadership” by Ige’s administration.

“You had no plan to begin with, and you didn’t know when something went wrong,” Hanabusa said. “Will you finally take personal responsibility for the missile fiasco?”

Ige won the primary contest, and Hanabusa finished out her congressional term in January 2019.

Out of office once again, Hanabusa mounted a campaign in 2020 to succeed term-limited Caldwell as mayor amid a crowded nonpartisan field of 15 candidates who included former Honolulu Mayor Mufi Hannemann, then-City Council member Kym Pine, former state high school athletics chief Keith Amemiya and former local television station general manager Rick Blangiardi.

Hanabusa finished third in the primary behind Amemiya and Blangiardi, who won the general election. Blangiardi in 2021 reappointed Hanabusa to HART’s board.

On Sept. 23, Hanabusa offered her letter of resignation to Blangiardi, effective Sept. 30, following her absence from the August HART board meeting. In the letter she said she could no longer effectively serve on the board where her term was to have run through June 30, 2026.

“Colleen and I once stood on opposite sides of a mayoral race, but what grew from that experience was a relationship built on mutual respect and friendship,” the mayor said Friday. “I came to appreciate her insight, her honesty, and her deep commitment to this community. I was grateful when she agreed to serve as Chair of the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation Board. Her leadership and steady guidance were instrumental during an important time for the Skyline project.”

Hanabusa is survived by her husband John Souza.

Star-Advertiser reporter Peter Boylan contributed to this report.